alice smith's blog : The Next Section Of The Community Safety Act Defines

Community safety is a top priority for the federal government, but the federal government allocates billions to punitive programs and not much to programs that improve community safety. The federal government should expand its funding for community safety initiatives, while at the same time building a flexible funding stream that is more likely to be able to scale up successful interventions. Developing and leveraging an evaluation component in grant funding would be a good start.

For starters, Congress should create a new program at HUD to support community members in developing place-based project plans. The HUD program would also have to be aligned with local, community-driven processes. This program would allow funds to be allocated locally, while at the same time supporting community members in transforming underutilized lands.

In addition, the United States should invest in a non-carceral agency dedicated to prevention-oriented public safety. This agency could serve as a conduit between community safety agencies and the federal government to share resources and coordinate inter-agency work. It could also be the hub for non-carceral survivor safety programs, as well as research and development on the prevention and reduction of violence.

Another thing the federal government should do is develop a "jobs guarantee" program. Creating this program could help rebuild a workforce and provide stability for vulnerable workers during economic downturns. A jobs guarantee program may be the best way to prioritize investments to improve employment outcomes, while at the same time highlighting the most effective approaches.

You are curious to know more about community safety act, click here. The Occupational Safety and Health Act is a federal law that helps states to assure the safety and health of their workers. This act includes research, training, and enforcement of occupational safety and health standards.

Investing in youth is a promising route to reduce violent crime. Research indicates that investing in young people can cut violent crime by 45%. According to a poll by the Vera Institute of Justice, schools are the most important factor in making a neighborhood safer. Investing in youth can also reduce the likelihood of violent behavior in the long run.

While these are all promising strategies, the most meaningful approach to community safety is prevention. This is not to suggest that investing in prevention is the answer to every challenge, but the most cost-effective way to build public safety. Providing training to local law enforcement officers on how to recognize and respond to domestic violent extremism is an example of a good idea. And providing economic empowerment to formerly incarcerated individuals is a worthwhile goal, as is reducing recidivism.

While many cities and counties already have central agencies devoted to promoting community safety, the federal government can help to make it a national priority. Central agencies like HUD can be an example to other states and municipalities, while at the same time ensuring that local communities have access to evidence-based programs and strategies. One such example is Oakland Unite, a collaborative within the Human Services Department. This collaborative works with youth at the highest risk for violence and provides services to help them reintegrate into society.

In: